Sat, 21 Oct 2000 14:28:16 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On 00-10-20 Dan Boger wrote:
> with all the questions about secmem, I figured a simple pointer can help,
> without installing insecure options by default. This was against 1.0.4,
> but I believe it'll work with older versions as well.
Why? There's README in the src-package and point 8 of the install
parapraph already explains the problem and the fix. So, I expect the
binary packages to also install this file into the documentation
directory of GnuPG. If the users refuse to read the documentation first
or look there for some help about this warning message, they don't need
other hints. It's always good style to read first the documentation and
then ask for help on a mailing-list. So I would suggest not including
your patch in GnuPG, as the hints are already visibel enough.
While the year 2000 (y2k) problem is not an issue for us, all Linux
implementations will impacted by the year 2038 (y2.038k) issue. The Debian
Project is committed to working with the industry on this issue and we will
have our full plans and strategy posted by the first quarter of 2020.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4a (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to email@example.com