Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 24 Oct 2000, Wayne Davis wrote:
> The folks ate NAI/PGP have made the assertion that GPG has taken PGP and
> reverse engineered it in order to obtain the source fo GPG.
> Can you provide the GPG side of this story?
Can you provide a source for that claim? I find it highly unlikely that
anyone at NAI actually said that.
Security Architect | "The world's gone crazy,
Technology Consultant | and it makes no sense..."
http://sion.quickie.net | --Sting
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to firstname.lastname@example.org