open source

L. Sassaman rabbi@quickie.net
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 17:55:52 -0700 (PDT)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24 Oct 2000, Wayne Davis wrote:


> The folks ate NAI/PGP have made the assertion that GPG has taken PGP and
> reverse engineered it in order to obtain the source fo GPG.
> Can you provide the GPG side of this story?
Can you provide a source for that claim? I find it highly unlikely that anyone at NAI actually said that. - --Len. __ L. Sassaman Security Architect | "The world's gone crazy, Technology Consultant | and it makes no sense..." | http://sion.quickie.net | --Sting -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE594EjPYrxsgmsCmoRAsa/AKCHmnHyF9Vn9G6bzvS+ldb/+a0SxQCg1JjM cGSPUHiPhzZlI7ATPjamjyk= =djzk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org