Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:04:10 +0100
For a start: Elgamal keys are (currently thought to be...) stronger than
RSA keys of the same size?
(see for example: http://www.scramdisk.clara.net/pgpfaq.html#SubRSADH).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack McKinney [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: 21 September 2000 13:54
> To: Simpson, Sam
> Subject: Re: RSA key-gen???
> Big Brother tells me that Werner Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > > I downloaded GnuPG 1.0.3 thinking I'd finally be able to
> have RSA-based
> > > keys given that the patent has expired. However, it
> appears that you still
> > > can't generate RSA keys using GPG. I looked through the
> keygen code and
> > Why do you thinlk RSA is better that DSA/ElGamal?
> Why do you think ElGamal is better than RSA?
> - --
> "In God We Trust. Jack McKinney
> Everyone else we monitor." firstname.lastname@example.org
> -Former NSA employee http://www.lorentz.com
> F4 A0 65 67 58 77 AF 9B FC B3 C5 6B 55 36 94 A6
Certain opinions expressed in this mail may be personal and may not be shared by Medical Insurance Agency Ltd or subsidiaries.
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error then please inform 'email@example.com' immediately and delete it and all copies from your system.
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to firstname.lastname@example.org