1.0.3 fails to verify RSA signature, 1.0.2 is OK
Sun, 01 Oct 2000 05:42:36 +1100
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 14:47:34 +0200 (MET DST),
Johan Wevers <email@example.com> wrote:
>You, Keith Owens, wrote:
>> The signature verifies using gnupg 1.0.2 and load-extension rsaref.
>> It does not verify using stock gnupg 1.0.3, with or without rsaref.
>Why do you use the rsaref module instead of the normal rsa module, which is
>already integrated in gpg 1.0.3?
I repeat: It does not verify using stock gnupg 1.0.3, with or without
rsaref. I tried 1.0.3 without load-extension rsaref and it still
failed to verify.
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to firstname.lastname@example.org