thoughts on options and commands

Ingo Klöcker
Sun Apr 22 19:07:02 2001

Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, 22. April 2001 06:28, Frank Tobin wrote:

> So, given this argument (no pun intended), I think that in the next
> major release of GnuPG, the command-line interface should be revamped
> to be more like cvs's.
The problem with a change of the command-line argument syntax is that this change will break all the thousands of scripts and programs which call GnuPG. I don't think a more "intuitive" command-line interface is worth all the trouble it will undoubtly cause. Regards, Ingo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see iD8DBQE64vtaGnR+RTDgudgRAk6kAKChpH/xY4NC7hiQ0MJs5hMhkdNafACfZU30 TpJeM5W3ubU5dHhBjXk1s14= =qgZN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----