thoughts on options and commands

[Ingo Klöcker]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday, 22. April 2001 06:28, Frank Tobin wrote:
> So, given this argument (no pun intended), I think that in the next
> major release of GnuPG, the command-line interface should be revamped
> to be more like cvs's.

The problem with a change of the command-line argument syntax is that 
this change will break all the thousands of scripts and programs which 
call GnuPG. I don't think a more "intuitive" command-line interface is 
worth all the trouble it will undoubtly cause.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE64vtaGnR+RTDgudgRAk6kAKChpH/xY4NC7hiQ0MJs5hMhkdNafACfZU30
TpJeM5W3ubU5dHhBjXk1s14=
=qgZN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----