my first steps with GnuPG...
   
    FALISSARD Thierry
     
    th.falissard@etic.fr
       
    Sat Apr 28 16:21:01 2001
    
    
  
Has this draft for next version of OpenPGP been published ?
Or is there a way to have packets stricly conform to the existing
version of the RFC ? I am not sure this can be done with
the option "--openpgp"...
> ----------
> De : 	Werner Koch[SMTP:wk@gnupg.org]
> Date=A0:	jeudi 26 avril 2001 00:09
> A :	gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Objet :	Re: my first steps with GnuPG...
>=20
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Falissard wrote:
>=20
> > I cannot understand it ! I was so sure GnuPG
> > was 100% compliant with RFC2440 !
>=20
> Well, I believe it is.  However most protocols are moving targets
> and the MDC packet is something which is in the draft for the next
> version of OpenPGP (same for Twofish and a lot of other things).
>=20
> We try to make sure that nothing gets broken but sometimes it just
> happens and old GnuPG versions might not be able to cope with a
> newer format.  I think upgrading is the easiest way to handle this
> and it fixes some quite serious security problems.
>=20
>  Werner
> =20
>=20
> --=20
> Werner Koch        Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum =
habetur
> g10 Code GmbH      et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
> Privacy Solutions                                        -- =
Augustinus
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>=20