US export compliance
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:12:45 -0800 (PST)
You are confusing patent laws with crypto export laws. Seek legal counsel
if you're going to be doing anything with this.
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:02:33PM -0800, L. Sassaman wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Rich wrote:
> > > It's not required since it is not a product of the US.
> > The question is still valid, I believe, if he wants to export it from US
> > computers.
> If the question is still valid, I don't see why it would be a problem.
> There is nothing in GnuPG that would violate US exportation laws. IDEA isn't
> included in the source, and RSA's license expired. Even if it hadn't, RSA
> isn't even in the source, so there would still be nothing to violate export
> Brad Littlejohn | Email: email@example.com
> Unix Systems Administrator, | firstname.lastname@example.org
> Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
> PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
Security Architect | "The world's gone crazy,
Technology Consultant | and it makes no sense..."
http://sion.quickie.net | --Sting
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to email@example.com