Expiry bug (can convert v3 key to current?)
Mon Jul 2 10:37:02 2001
|| On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 14:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
|| Len Sassaman <email@example.com> wrote:
ls> Erm, wait a second. I read that a little too fast.
ls> Werner, what's going on here?
The specs only say that the primary key must be capable of signing.
There is nothing in it to forbid a signing-only subkey. In fact it
has always been possible to create a DSA subkey with GnuPG.
I agree that gpg has the bug to ask for some properties (size of key)
and later ignores the values because they make no sense for DSA.
Werner Koch Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions -- Augustinus