HOWTO on interfacing with gnupg/pgp?
John Arundel
john@splange.freeserve.co.uk
Sat Jun 30 10:56:01 2001
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On 2001-06-27 at 05:55:02, Lionel Elie Mamane warbled:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:10:27PM +0100, John Arundel wrote, incoherently:
> > pgpgpg does a reasonable job, though at the moment it just
> > translates GnuPG command-line options to PGP options,
>
> Isn't it the other way round? It seems to me it translates PGP options
> to GnuPG options, which isn't what you would need to use GPGME with
> PGP.
Yes, quite so. I didn't mean to suggest that pgpgpg would be useful in this
particular case. However it demonstrates the wrapper idea, and I dare say
the code would be a good starting point for writing a PGP wrapper.
Though using PGP when you could use GnuPG, especially if it costs you some
trouble to do so, seems to border on the perverse... ;o)
John
--
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it." - Groucho Marx
____________________________________________________________________________
I prefer encrypted mail (see headers for PGP key)
Why encrypt? http://www.heureka.clara.net/sunrise/pgpwhy.htm
____________________________________________________________________________
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7PZWVw69+kJpgH/QRAjzKAJ0cxo/GJ1Tfg9fT59P6H9luAV7VvACfQAlQ
wEvh7Upq0IWrJQnBMt1BQf0=
=WyCc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--