secret key id disclosure

Ryan Malayter rmalayter@bai.org
Wed Oct 10 18:36:01 2001


My DSS/DH secret keys don't have the same key-id as their corresponding
public keys. Perhaps that relationship is true only of RSA keys?


:::Ryan Malayter
:::Bank Administration Institute
:::Chicago, Illinois, USA

:::Ryan Malayter, MCSE
:::Bank Administration Institute
:::Chicago, Illinois, USA
-----Original Message----- From: disastry@saiknes.lv.NO.SPaM.NET [mailto:disastry@saiknes.lv.NO.SPaM.NET] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:45 AM To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re: secret key id disclosure *** PGP Signature Status: good *** Signer: Disastry <disastry@saiknes.lv> (Invalid) *** Signed: 10/10/2001 12:42:22 AM *** Verified: 10/10/2001 11:25:38 AM *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** chrisb wrote:
> Hello. Have I compromised my secret key or encryption strength if I
> have disclosed its id like this:
>
> pub 1024D/8066516A 2006-12-01 my name <myaddy@my.com>
> sub 1024g/GGGGGGGG 2006-12-01 [expires: 2010-12-01]
> Chris
no. and you can disclose GGGGGGGG without compromising anything too. GGGGGGGG is not the secret key id but the subkey id. btw, secret key have the same key-id as public key == <EOF> == Disastry http://i.am/disastry/ http://disastry.dhs.org/pgp <----PGP plugins for Netscape and MDaemon ^--GPG for Win32 (supports loadable modules and IDEA) ^----PGP 2.6.3ia-multi05 (supports IDEA, CAST5, BLOWFISH, TWOFISH, AES, 3DES ciphers and MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA2 hashes) *** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users