Sig classification (was Re: discussion on increasing amount of gpg signatures...)

David Shaw dshaw@jabberwocky.com
Mon Oct 15 01:04:03 2001


--ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 11:12:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 01:25:52PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
>=20
> > sig 1 3CB3B415 2001-10-14 David M. Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
> > sig 2 3CB3B415 2001-10-14 David M. Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
> > sig 3 3CB3B415 2001-10-14 David M. Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
>=20
> It would be nice if these could be presented more clearly. I can't
> actually suggest a clearer way off-hand, mind you.
Heh. I had the same thought. I thought about using letters, but it was even worse. At least numbers have the advantage of making a "3" clearly higher than a "2".
> Also, it would be
> nice if there were no space between the "sig" and the digit as in
> current output.
Try a --check-sigs. That space is taken for the sig status character. David --=20 David Shaw | dshaw@jabberwocky.com | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/ +--------------------------------------------------------------------------= -+ "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQEVAwUBO8oZPIccwqs8s7QVAQF7VQf6A9OtLvAa0biDYsvsE+AEzKRid3epOOue P+4RbAkxHEAByrTY1c2j3zwMDQ2YrAchBaNGYhMQx5EHZf9vy+2A9IR1nCbmtrUP ezC5DiMZwzTGhg//dyoJRz8MPZvvARhPMHG1139V7ru4c0m0RoPft7qLYSXd0w90 yXZA6+jj8vCCZ+ags0nf2ucdIw+/uqasBGiY+8Jwrnt5H1QrglWFZmV4rKzUPoHu xl7xzTCOnY33e2nMWdZbKMoyh+D07eys/K24cT25pxGOql96WVwifL42pEocrKNx 4296EtUhxaV0uKMIHJYe9rGGES0Hs19EN1tEFbZ6bI2M+FwRp6YthQ== =2Y6T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ--