Sig classification (was Re: discussion on increasing amount of gpg signatures...)

[David Shaw]

--ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 11:12:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 01:25:52PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
>=20
> >  sig 1      3CB3B415 2001-10-14  David M. Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
> >  sig 2      3CB3B415 2001-10-14  David M. Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
> >  sig 3      3CB3B415 2001-10-14  David M. Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
>=20
> It would be nice if these could be presented more clearly.  I can't
> actually suggest a clearer way off-hand, mind you.

Heh.  I had the same thought.  I thought about using letters, but it
was even worse.  At least numbers have the advantage of making a "3"
clearly higher than a "2".

> Also, it would be
> nice if there were no space between the "sig" and the digit as in
> current output.

Try a --check-sigs.  That space is taken for the sig status character.

David

--=20
   David Shaw  |  dshaw@jabberwocky.com  |  WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-+
   "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
      We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson

--ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQEVAwUBO8oZPIccwqs8s7QVAQF7VQf6A9OtLvAa0biDYsvsE+AEzKRid3epOOue
P+4RbAkxHEAByrTY1c2j3zwMDQ2YrAchBaNGYhMQx5EHZf9vy+2A9IR1nCbmtrUP
ezC5DiMZwzTGhg//dyoJRz8MPZvvARhPMHG1139V7ru4c0m0RoPft7qLYSXd0w90
yXZA6+jj8vCCZ+ags0nf2ucdIw+/uqasBGiY+8Jwrnt5H1QrglWFZmV4rKzUPoHu
xl7xzTCOnY33e2nMWdZbKMoyh+D07eys/K24cT25pxGOql96WVwifL42pEocrKNx
4296EtUhxaV0uKMIHJYe9rGGES0Hs19EN1tEFbZ6bI2M+FwRp6YthQ==
=2Y6T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ--