Generation of public key

Anthony E. Greene agreene@pobox.com
Wed Oct 17 17:34:01 2001


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Nick Andriash wrote:

>Hello Anthony E. Greene,
>
>On Tuesday, October 16 2001 at 02:23 PM PDT, you wrote:
>
>> Try the NT version at <http://www.gnupg.org/>. If the NT version does not
>> work on Win2000, you have several choices:
>
>Why is it that *she* has several choices? Why doesn't the GnuPG Team do
>something about it?
Would you like it better if I'd said she was shit out of luck? She effectively would be out of luck if we were talking about proprietary software. She has choices. That is not a bad thing. As a matter of fact, I noted that one of her choices was to "Wait for the project contributors to write the code." How is that substantially different from your suggestion that "the GnuPG Team do something about it"?
>Was not a condition of the funding provided by the
>German Government that a Win32 version be developed?
Even if that's correct (and I'm not convinced that it is), it's a side issue unless the original poster pays taxes in Germany. In other words, she has no inherent right to the benefits paid for by the German government unless she contributed to those payments.
>> 5. Use a supported operating system.
>
>What are the *supported* OS's?
The ones that are listed on the GnuPG Web site. Tony - -- Anthony E. Greene <agreene@pobox.com> <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/> PGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D Chat: AOL/Yahoo: TonyG05 Linux. The choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Anthony E. Greene <agreene@pobox.com> 0x6C94329D iD8DBQE7zaRdpCpg3WyUI50RAp9bAJ4s2E0MZ7JqpT7P+CzzX3ScO0sAIACfffAz 12YPdQauVabgKjSHm2r6vY0= =LWWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----