Can't check pgp-6.5.8 signatura

Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel rbp@isnomore.net
Wed Oct 17 22:20:01 2001


On Wed, Oct 17 2001 at 06:00:35PM BRST, "Justin R. Miller" <justin@solidlinux.com> wrote:

> Thus spake mike ledoux (mwl+gnupg@alumni.unh.edu):
>
> > This is the format specified in RFC2440 for plain-text signatures.
> > This format has the major advantage that *anyone* using OpenPGP
> > software can handle messages in this format, regardless of MUA, and
> > those not using OpenPGP software can at least still read the message
> > text.
>
> This has been discussed at length in the past few weeks.
I wasn't here, then, so please forgive me if I'm kicking a dead body...
> I don't
> believe non-PGP/MIME provides for non-English character sets.
I just sent myself a test message with "áéíóú ü ãõ ç" and stuff like that, and my signature checked ok (--clearsign).
> I'm
> preparing a compilation of replies on this topic for use in my next
> revision of the Mutt/GnuPG doc (and that has some relevance here, since
> Mutt seems to be one of the few MUAs that uses PGP/MIME by default, thus
> ticking a lot of people off).
Indeed. I'm using a few macros to use gpg as I think it's the most portable way (ie, cleartext, in the message body). Not very handy, though, it'd be great if mutt would understand it natively. rbp ______________________________________________________________________ Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel <rbp@isnomore.net> http://www.linuxsp.org.br http://isnomore.net GPG: <0x81F85A48> 7E62 9CA2 C95B FC86 B334 203E C011 2E4D 81F8 5A48 When people look like ants - pull! When ants look like people - pray!