Generation of public key

[Nick Andriash]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Anthony,

On Friday, October 19 2001 at 04:43 PM PDT, you wrote:

> Your response to my list of options was rude, which is why I
> responded to you the way I did. All Dale did is respond to you the
> same way I did.

Then please accept my apology, because that certainly was not my intent.
My thoughts were that if the GnuPG Development Team is wanting GnuPG to
be thought of as a replacement for PGP, then surely they are the ones
that should be responding to those who have OS specific problems,
instead of the end Users having to write their own code, or short of
that having someone else write it for them. 

My other question to you about which were the 'supported' OS's, was made
in earnest because the GnuPG Web Site specifically states Win 2K is one
of those supported OS's, so I just wanted to make sure we were talking
about the same thing.

Again, my apologies to all who took offense to my posting.


- -- 
Nick

   -=N.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=-
Win 98SE | GnuPG v1.06 (MingW32) | Becky v2.00.07
___________________________________________________

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - GnuPGshell v2.00
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: PGP-Basics-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

iD8DBQE70NFFxQKEdHuj/c4RAvoQAJ9JwnH3biloaOda+GgwAFv4Df/WcwCeK54J
KF2vS+wFjaa/bTexQwrMLQU=
=RWyg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----