Mutt/GnuPG doc initial release

Mon Sep 24 07:00:01 2001

--6lXr1rPCNTf1w0X8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thus spake Len Sassaman (rabbi@quickie.net):

> This is not correct. The only people who refer to the inline

> ASCII-armored signatures as "outdated" are the Mutt developers. Read

> the RFCs.

Ok, thanks for the info Len.  I'll read up and correct as necessary.=20

--=20

| Justin R. Miller / justin@solidlinux.com / 0xC9C40C31

| Of all the things I've lost, I miss my pants the most.

----------------------------------------------------------

--6lXr1rPCNTf1w0X8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7rr0794d6K8nEDDERAjYQAJ9JBCGzlpooE8euL5/N65i1pVC5QwCfXwRR
PTKc5a0oRIaaiHxoek8vna0=
=V5Gv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6lXr1rPCNTf1w0X8--