GnuPG 1.0.6 versus PGP 2.6.3i

[Marc Mutz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 24 September 2001 23:14, Marek Schneider wrote:
> what would be "the better" choice due to security issues?
> GnuPG 1.0.6 or PGP 2.6.3i

What answer do you expect from a GnuPG mailing list? ;-)

Of course, GnuPG is much more mature and supports OpenPGP. As I 
understand it, PGP 2.6.3 has critical bugs in it, too. And no-one will 
fix them there...

Marc

- -- 
All animals are equal. But some animals are more equal than others.
                                   -- George Orwell "Animal Farm"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7sFaQ3oWD+L2/6DgRArqJAKDo0xMnyA37Me6Jszl1YYDU13iEQACfeK/2
AUN1vC3kr3Faxa4xJyNr6+s=
=J9Yd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----