Difficulties with PGP 7.1?

Peter T. Abplanalp pta@psaconsultants.com
Thu Apr 11 18:38:01 2002

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

i have been using mutt because it seems to support gnupg and pgp the
best of all the mailers i've seen; however, i took a look at evolution
recently and found that it had problems with some signatures that mutt
verified as good.  what i'm saying is that i think the problem is with
evolution and not gnupg.  i haven't gotten around to trying to contact
the evolution folks though.

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bid=
der wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:25, Werner Koch wrote:
> > On 11 Apr 2002 10:42:08 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder sai=
> >=20
> > > I'm using 1.0.3 - perhaps some things are fixed in cvs. So I'll just
> > > wait. (after all, it's not critical to me, it's just annoying.).
> >=20
> > Noteworthy changes in version 1.0.4 (2000-10-17)
> [...]
> Thanks - and sorry, I was unclear. Evolution 1.0.3, that is. gpg 1.0.6.
> cheers
> -- vbi

Peter Abplanalp

Email:   pta@psaconsultants.com
PGP:     pgp.mit.edu

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org