implications of subkeys?

[JanuszA.Urbanowicz]

Nick Andriash wrote/napisa=B3[a]/schrieb:
> Hello Frank Tobin,
>=20
> On Tuesday, February 26 2002 at 12:00 PM PDT, you wrote:
>=20
> > This allows you to stay keep your web of trust, and you simply create
> > a new subkey.
>=20
> You mention subkeys are signed, then if one revokes a subkey, he/she
> will lose all the signatures on it, correct? If that is the case, then I
> do not understand how that maintains your web of trust?

Others can't sign a subkey (or a primary key)- they sign  the UIDs which are
atatched to a primary key.

Alex
--=20
C _-=3D-_ H| Janusz A. Urbanowicz | ALEX3-RIPE | SF-F Framling |         | =
  *  =09
 ; (_O : +-------------------------------------------------------------+ --=
+~|=09
 ! &~) ? | P=B3yn=B1=E6 chc=EA na Wsch=F3d, za Suez, gdzie jest dobrem ka=
=BFde z=B3o | l_|/=09
A ~-=3D-~ O| Gdzie przykaza=F1 brak dziesi=EAciu, a pi=E6 mo=BFna a=BF po d=
no;     |   |  =20