removing the secmem warning

[Daniel Monjar]

I believe you've missed my point... If non-secure memory is an issue =
then=20
hiding the warning from neophyte users (better?) does more harm than =
good.=20
If it is not a real issue than it shouldn't be warned about.

I like the suggestion of adding a URL to the error message giving fur=
ther=20
explanation.

Didn't realize this was a movement... hang on, just had a flashback f=
rom=20
the 70's.

--On Monday, January 07, 2002 11:38 AM -0800 Nick Andriash=20
<andriash@shaw.ca> wrote:

> Daniel Monjar,
>
> On Monday, January 07 2002 at 11:18 AM PDT, you wrote:
>
>> Just because they are clueless newbies doesn't
>> mean they should be coddled to.
>
> Clueless newbies???  Good heaven's man!! Go grab a cup of coffee or
> something. It's people like yourself that make it difficult to attr=
act
> new Users to GPG/PGP. Statements like that do more harm to this mov=
ement
> than anything else I can think of.
>
>
> --
> Nick
>
>     -=3DN.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=3D-
> Win 98SE | GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) | Becky v2.00.08
> _____________________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users



--
Daniel Monjar
IS Manager, Technical Services
bioM=E9rieux, Inc.
Durham, NC US