David Shaw wrote: [snip] > Is it possible you are looking at the number after the "sig" in a key > listing? > sig 3 515E30C7 2002-02-11 Ivo Alxneit..... He talked about GnuPG 1.0.6. Those signature classes have been introduced in 1.0.7, so it cannot be this he's looking at. -- Stefan Bellon * <mailto:sbellon@sbellon.de> * <http://www.sbellon.de/> PGP 2 and OpenPGP keys available from my home page