E-Mail Encryption: Why Isn't Everyone Doing It?

[Graham]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 25 Oct 2002 10:26 am, David Pic=F3n =C1lvarez wrote:

[snipped]

> Obviously, everyone has the right to use whatever software they
> prefer and in whatever manner. I just think that: 1) spending gnupg's
> developers time in a GUI wouldn't be optimum resource allocation. 2)
> a gui may not be the best thing from a security standpoint. 3) I
> don't believe creating a gnupg gui for unix would increase its user
> base.
>
> Anyway, I don't want to seem fanatical or something. :-)

I'm not asking that gnupg developers spend their time on a GUI for GPG. =20
I think that there is a demand for a GUI to the functions of GPG in=20
Linux (as least from me and several other members of the PGP-Basics=20
List), and I'd like to see if it is a practical possibility.

If it withers on the vine, then (clearly) I am in a small minority.  But=20
I think that somebody should start the ball rolling to see.
- --=20

Graham
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Please sign and encrypt for internet privacy

iD8DBQE9uSxrIwtBZOk1250RAs6JAJ91Pvl2pokrRK1OfY6URhJpRrm3rgCgjREJ
TH/dx/CPVxkfIt64d/zM8qU=3D
=3Du5lh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----