Double encryption ??

[gabriel rosenkoetter]

--UEgmpZn7Z/frN9Sq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +0200, Oliver Hankeln wrote:
> The only reason why this could happen as seen by us is that the text has=
=20
> been encrypted twice  - with my and with his public key.
> We just want to be sure we didn=B4t make any mistakes. Is our assumption=
=20
> right?

The assumption's correct and, unless you've used --throw-key, GnuPG
should tell you exactly that (two "encrypted for...") lines.

I'm guessing either that each of you followed a set of setup
instructions that involved putting a "encrypt-to ..." line in your
=2Egnupg/{options,gpg.conf} or that your MUAs do it by default after
being told your default private key (for signing).

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--UEgmpZn7Z/frN9Sq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+kXpb9ehacAz5CRoRAmdoAJ4pxfA0eWTofqaSN+1zSsnCjUrapgCgjDiP
1fCddMwnPfkn3x3akbnK8Rc=
=u+3j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UEgmpZn7Z/frN9Sq--