GPG

Per Tunedal pt@radvis.nu
Fri Apr 11 10:46:25 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
Well OPENSOURCE is extremely important to encryption software. The source
must be available for review, otherwise you don't know if the software is
secure. PGP is not opensorce but the source is available for "peer review"
and is thus judged as secure.

GPGShell has been more mature than WinPT for a long while and it's
extremely similar to PGP and thus easy to use. But I will never use it as
the source isn't available.

Per Tunedal

At 16:06 2003-04-10 -0400, you wrote:

 >
 >On 10 Apr 2003 at 12:27, Toxik - Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
 >
 >> An important clarification: GPGRelay and Enigmail are email tools,
 >> but WinPT is for general use with all types of content: email, files,
 >> clipboard, etc.
 >
 >Just curious, but I've scanned this list for a while now, and haven't
 >seen much mention of GPGShell. I realize it's not open source, but I
 >feel that it's more "powerful" and PGP-like.
 >
 >Am I missing something?
 >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.92

iD8DBQE+loD12Jp9Z++ji2YRAoaCAJ4pLQXC0BKUVUensp5L4skJEuQN/wCcCbD/
dIAZ9pVfKQuCVl0gYgFm5n0=
=CCIw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----