RSA key size restriction?
Maxine Brandt
torduninja at inbox.lv
Fri Dec 12 21:15:08 CET 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Shaw wrote:
|> | Again, if someone generates such a key, GnuPG will work with it.
I
|> | still don't see the need to make it easy to generate them though,
|> | especially given that if someone wanted it badly enough, they can
|> | remove the line of code that prevents it themselves.
|> |
|> Which line?
| Search for "keysize too large" in g10/keygen.c
Thanks, David. That should be good enough for those of us who want to
generate oversize keys for some reason.
Actually, I agree with the criticism of these large keys, but I have a
correspondent who refuses all encrypted communication with keys
smaller than 7680 bits. Paranoia or eccentricity - I'm not sure. I
have a large RSA v4 key created with a hacked PGP version, but I'm not
happy with it because it has a v3 signature on the subkey, which
doesn't seem too reglo for my taste.
Salut,
Maxine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: My OpenPGP keys are at http://www.torduninja.tk
iD8DBQE/2g/4KBY/R6nbCcARAo1dAJ4rsmOy5yUTCBzSToxD7hjLeFNA3QCfUGtE
qUVWMXdpcGNtagoECVuVYbI=
=F75t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list