BAD signature (was Re: Article on PGP uses Gnupg :))

Ingo Klöcker ingo.kloecker@epost.de
Tue Jan 14 09:11:02 2003


--Boundary-02=_Dl0I+966/z0a3zw
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 10 January 2003 17:37, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder=20
wrote:
> The ongoing let's-annoy-everybody-as-long-as-it-doesn't-work
> campain...
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 00:09, Charly Avital wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 10 00:08:57 2003 CET using DSA key ID
> C91B085E gpg: BAD signature from "Charly Avital (1.0.7)
> <shavital@netvision.net.il>"

Same here with KMail 1.5. So at l(e)ast KMail and Evolution agree. ;-)

Regards,
Ingo


--Boundary-02=_Dl0I+966/z0a3zw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+I0lDGnR+RTDgudgRAqp6AJ0QXyZLaBbuSWa8R0gLAFRrnJjV1wCbBJO8
HjOCx5zIGsMiqXQH3Ghim3Y=
=kdGJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_Dl0I+966/z0a3zw--