compression and encryption
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
avbidder@fortytwo.ch
Thu Jan 23 08:59:06 2003
--=-3A0D1DijQ09zwQMnHjYd
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 21:33, Michael Anckaert wrote:
> > In other words: any data compression must come before encryption to
> > gain anything. gpg usually compresses data anyway before encrypting
> > it, so you could try how good you get without explicit compression.
> I'm using bzip2 and think (correct me when wrong) that this is better
> compression than the one gpg uses.
Yes. I just thought that perhaps the (g)zip compression used in gpg
would already suffice for your purposes, and bzip2 is not only good, but
also quite slow... But I agree that it's quite a bit better in most
(all) cases.
> So to put it simply:
> archive -> compress -> encrypt
Yep.
cheers
-- vbi
--=20
OpenPGP encrypted mail welcme - my key: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
--=-3A0D1DijQ09zwQMnHjYd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA+L6E0Kqpm2L3fmXoRAhgvAKCw4IZQ5JI3UHxNKYsrCsli0pIuyQCfR+pr
1zBzAooNwBsMF/zBUCzdHKA=
=07ES
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-3A0D1DijQ09zwQMnHjYd--