Curious about public keys and keyservers.
Jean-David Beyer
jdbeyer@exit109.com
Wed Jul 2 17:35:03 2003
David Shaw wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:20:03AM -0400, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>
>>I recently tried to upload my public key, and it seems to have worked.
>>
>>But when I did:
>>
>>valinux:jdbeyer[~]$ gpg --export --armor Whimsey
>>
>>I got:
>>
>>-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>>mQGiBDusCNwRBAC3+jP8KebZBtVvVJs5NG9EhAmPDEzToMF/RfKe2J9AMbm8ckn3
>>[snip]
>>pgmsXaK9wirCAuTofwsAwv38dg==
>>=dIrq
>>-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>>
>>I then uploaded it and the keyservers have:
>>
>>-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>>Version: SKS 1.0.4
>>
>>mQGiBDusCNwRBAC3+jP8KebZBtVvVJs5NG9EhAmPDEzToMF/RfKe2J9AMbm8ckn3aLoFre1B
>>[snip]
>>wirCAuTofwsAwv38dg==
>>=73sB
>>-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>>
>>Everything except the =dIrq and the =73sB at the end is the same.
>
>
> Are you sure they are the same all the way through? It's easy to miss
> a few digit differences in the middle of a long armor block.
>
> David
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3rc1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Key available at http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc
>
> iD8DBQE/AuLm4mZch0nhy8kRAjQ1AKCvL4JCgYejJ5XFJyG8NmGWJOmYewCfYQH0
> 4s5P/+QOhqrVaD5IDv30tZ0=
> =f6eo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
>
OK: they are not quite the same, but why does theirs not quite agree?
Here is
valinux:jdbeyer[~/.gnupg]$ diff myKey theirKey
2c2
< Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
---
> Version: SKS 1.0.4
14,17c14,17
< eWVyQGpkYmV5ZXIuZXhpdDEwOS5jb20+iFcEExECABcFAjutP3gFCwcKAwQDFQMC
< AxYCAQIXgAAKCRA+27Zemi/JmvthAJ9ak3nke4KuWaH+v1/K/hy/2VLEHgCeOecf
< n75Gpw2MoWnzlRzWi8g4eaSIRgQTEQIABgUCPwBkeQAKCRBNN8YtRn+/fSELAKCH
< JOqRvQwt+tgWXiuK19NY6n3ZfACePgJ5zDqSJv4LCqmwvueonKdkQCm5AQ0EO6wI
---
> eWVyQGpkYmV5ZXIuZXhpdDEwOS5jb20+iEYEExECAAYFAj8AZHkACgkQTTfGLUZ/
> v30hCwCghyTqkb0MLfrYFl4ritfTWOp92XwAnj4Cecw6kib+CwqpsL7nqJynZEAp
> iFcEExECABcFAjutP3gFCwcKAwQDFQMCAxYCAQIXgAAKCRA+27Zemi/JmvthAJ9a
> k3nke4KuWaH+v1/K/hy/2VLEHgCeOecfn75Gpw2MoWnzlRzWi8g4eaS5AQ0EO6wI
51c51
< =dIrq
---
> =73sB
These guys seem to have it right (I pasted mine into their window), but
these guys
hthttp://sks.dnsalias.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=whimsey&op=vindextp://sks.dnsalias.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=whimsey&op=vindex
have it wrong; I uploaded it with
gpg --send-key Whimsey
keyserver hkp://sks.dnsalias.net
is in my .gnupg/options file.
Could they both be right?
Is there a bug in gpg --send-key?
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 11:25am up 14 days, 13:58, 2 users, load average: 2.05, 2.04, 2.06