OpenPGP vs inline PGP

[John B]

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 10 July 2003 17:22, Neil Williams wrote:

  <snip>

> 1980's? Do you think all sysadmin stuff should be done in a GUI just
> because it's 2003? GUI's are only a part of the answer, I believe a major
> problem with Windows was the removal of command-line configuration tools
> and the reliance on GUI settings. There are some configurations that simp=
ly
> cannot be achieved through LinuxConf or Webmin or anything else GUI.
> Especially where remote machines are concerned - all you have is SSH
> usually so vi or emacs is the only way of working.

  I have to agree here 100%. The gui was made for convenience for 'Joe user=
',=20
*not* for *good* admin'ing of a server(s)/intranet/whatever. The gui makes=
=20
one *dependent* on those who made said gui, and thus you have to hope it wa=
s=20
done right or the way you want it.

  <snip>

  John
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/DhmGH5oDXyLKXKQRAs8MAJ95fCmP7/1gqF//ulVg32J37Xt3EwCdGL3N
VcVsW3p/3JWIdEyeyqGekvA=3D
=3DXzyY
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----