signature as attachment?

[Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder]

--Boundary-02=_3cPF/SLitrdEKz1
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 16 July 2003 05:59, Ben Finney wrote:

> OT: Is it part of the PGP/MIME statndard that the signature should not
> have a suggested attachment filename?  I'd think it would make more
> sense to give a filename, to avoid having the MUA choose its own
> arbitrary name for the attachment.

Don't know what kmail (cryptplugin) does (look at this message) but iirc=20
evolution and mutt both provide a filename usually (at least I distinctly=20
remember having seen PGP/MIME messages with at least two different filename=
s)

cheers
=2D- vbi

=2D-=20
random link of the day: http://fortytwo.ch/sienapei/galoozog

--Boundary-02=_3cPF/SLitrdEKz1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iKcEABECAGcFAj8U9zdgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJEIukMYvlp/fWpO0An1pff5kYVSqO/FlDgQ6nc5eb
ZBMYAJ9edK2aqFQ/dDQBL7XVVan8Zr4Wxw==
=HtSZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Signature policy: http://fortytwo.ch/legal/gpg/email.20020822?version=1.5&md5sum=5dff868d11843276071b25eb7006da3e

--Boundary-02=_3cPF/SLitrdEKz1--