Is this even possible?

[Robin Lynn Frank]

On Sunday 08 June 2003 19:32, Eddie Roosenmaallen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Decryption alone doesn't need a passphrase - the pass is only used for
> decryption and for signing. The unique ID is reasonably easy too - you =
can
> use a serial number (1, 2, 3...), some combination of the date & time, =
or
> the SMTP message-ID.
>
> Are look looking to encrypt all _incoming_ mail to a certain address, o=
r
> all _outgoing_ mail?
>
Outgoing is easy.  What we are looking to do is encrypt all incoming mail=
 to=20
one address.  This arrives unencrypted, but we want local storage to be=20
encrypted.

--=20
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Robin Lynn Frank - Director of Operations - Paradigm-Omega, LLC
Copyright and PGP/GPG info in mail or message headers.
Email acceptance policy at http://paradigm-omega.com/email_policy.html
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D