Documentation blues

Robin Lynn Frank rlfrank@paradigm-omega.com
Wed Jun 25 07:34:02 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Tuesday 24 June 2003 07:14 pm, Joseph Bruni wrote:
> >> I see, enforcing the use of RIPEMD160 and TWOFISH Instead of SHA1
> >> and whatever is esoteric.  But then again most folks don't have to
> >> deal with a security director who gets livid at the mention of SHA1
> >> or AES.  Well, come to think of it, maybe it is esoteric ;-) (Hope
> >> he doesn't see this)
>
> Whoa. What's wrong with SHA1 and AES?
>
>
Nothing that I know of, but our security director a bit unhappy when the =
US=20
Gov't. did not select twofish.  I'm not sure how much of his position is=20
political and how much is technical.  I think a lot of his objection was =
=20
that any consideration was given to its ability to be used by devices wit=
h=20
limited memory.  He felt it was a compromise that had no real merit.  We=20
humor him quite a lot ;-)

- --=20
Robin Lynn Frank
Director of Operations
Paradigm-Omega, LLC
    ******
The need to do something is
inversely proportional to the
time available.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE++TSYmq9pLlRaCV8RAzSdAJ4hEGUk6Dqdm78efsfonBI04JyppACggrSU
I7o2dw/IdmbtCLVVj39lfkg=3D
=3DiJPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----