Robots in the WoT
Wed Jun 25 21:37:01 2003
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:02:02PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> >Blah. This is what I was afraid would happen someday:
> What's wrong with that? From what I see, 0x42473204 has no other outside
> signatures that would allow a path. If you didn't have this path, you'd
> have none at all.
NB: biglumber users know that sloppy "at" zapitron.com maps to
0x01A50ED0314A30F8B8995854C8877F5A42473204 as long as we can trust Greg,
Greg's code, and that http://biglumber.com/ has never been compromised.
But, I also like to see this mapping expressed as a signature from
Robot CA, http://www.toehold.com/robotca/ , on the key.
In fact, I prefer keys that are listed on biglumber, signed by Robot CA,
and have signatures based on in-person meetings.
Also try the trace with a newer version of Jonathan's pathfinder:
and Jorgen's wotsap:
Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
firstname.lastname@example.org | web: http://jharris.cjb.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----