Keysigning

Lucas Gonze lucas@gonze.com
Fri May 9 21:34:02 2003


No need to rip me a new asshole, thanks.

IP location works well for most people, so it's a sensible default, and it
incorporates laziness, which is a virtue.

Over and out.

- Lucas

On Fri, 9 May 2003, Chris Hedemark wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Friday, May 9, 2003, at 12:46 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
>
> > There are a number of services that do geolocation based on IP address.
> > These are all commercial, as far as I know.
>
> I subscribe to the list so there is no reason to send me two copies.
>
> Anywho, geolocation based on IP address flat out simply doesn't work.
> Don't believe me?  Give me a web site to visit and then based on your
> server logs tell me where in the world I am within 100 miles of
> accuracy.  You can't.  When you're talking about something like
> keysignings your accuracy needs to be much greater still.  Most folks
> are willing to drive only so far to meet someone to swap signatures.
> If you're giving them too many false hits for "neighbors" the system
> will be useless out of the starting gate.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAj678mEACgkQYPuF4Zq9lvZRXACg8q6+4klY55BbJWx6eoi5o2+h
> CTsAnivYzIbDL2Ri1MjHfKDzeOG9ygAc
> =x1uq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>