User attributes and audio IDs (was: Trouble signing)
Sat May 17 20:08:02 2003
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 07:46:55AM +0100, David Picon Alvarez wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> > I'd be interested to hear comments about whether people would make
> > good use of something like an audio ID or not. It certainly has the
> > potential to make keys very very large, though perhaps that is the
> > problem and choice of the key holder.
> I'd really like to have audio IDs, and with the right compression it
> shouldn't make the keys too big. I'm somewhat biased here, though, since =
> a blind user.
Agreed. Though i'm not biased that way, i like cli environments more
than guis and an ascii art representation of an image is of no use here.
Mayde the xiph.org's speex codec could be of some use here. At least if
the audio ID shall be a voice sample. But probably availability etc.
are a problem here.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----