newbie question about identities

[David Shaw]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:58:04PM +0000, rhkelly wrote:

> I said just 'PKI' where I should have said PKI/WOT.
> (or perhaps just WOT - in context of gpg, PKI *is* WOT -
> I know, gpg /can/ be used without WOT; but it gets to
> be difficult to do so, since almost every component in
> it assumes otherwise. But this *is* a different topic).

Just a note - you use GnuPG without the WOT if you put:
  trust-model always
in your gpg.conf file.

This disables all trust calculations, and treats all keys (signed or
not) equally.

David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.3-cvs (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key available at http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc

iHEEARECADEFAj9+83wqGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuamFiYmVyd29ja3kuY29tL2Rhdmlk
L2tleXMuYXNjAAoJEOJmXIdJ4cvJfl4AoJrmylA/n630u+0BJZ4werjHY/vjAKC1
VjDuyi7TtF/VlsCczdryqt5k3A==
=7OyW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----