newbie question about identities
Sat Oct 4 19:19:01 CEST 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:58:04PM +0000, rhkelly wrote:
> I said just 'PKI' where I should have said PKI/WOT.
> (or perhaps just WOT - in context of gpg, PKI *is* WOT -
> I know, gpg /can/ be used without WOT; but it gets to
> be difficult to do so, since almost every component in
> it assumes otherwise. But this *is* a different topic).
Just a note - you use GnuPG without the WOT if you put:
in your gpg.conf file.
This disables all trust calculations, and treats all keys (signed or
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.3-cvs (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key available at http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users