primary?

David Shaw dshaw@jabberwocky.com
Sun Sep 21 04:40:01 2003


--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:58:03PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:18:14PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> > You can upgrade your key if you like.  Do "gpg --expert --edit-key",
> > and enter "sign".  GnuPG will ask you if you want to upgrade.  Say
> > yes.
>=20
> OK, I did that, and figured, cool, with a new style key, I'll add a
> photo:
>=20
> Command> addphoto
> WARNING: This is a PGP2-style key.  Adding a photo ID may cause some vers=
ions
>          of PGP to reject this key.
> Are you sure you still want to add it? (y/N)=20
>=20
> It did let me change the primary, but still seems to think it's a PGP2
> key...

It still is a PGP 2 key.  Updating only updates the user IDs (actually
updating the self-signatures on the user IDs).  The key itself remains
PGP 2, and cannot be updated.

If you aren't concerned about PGP 2 compatibility (since you updated
your user IDs, I assume you aren't), you can safely answer "yes" to
that question.

Perhaps I should change the code to not ask the photo ID question if
there are any OpenPGP self-signatures on the key... the user of such a
key has already made a decision about PGP 2 compatibility.

David

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.3-cvs (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key available at http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc

iHEEARECADEFAj9tD8cqGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuamFiYmVyd29ja3kuY29tL2Rhdmlk
L2tleXMuYXNjAAoJEOJmXIdJ4cvJ2lYAnjr82/VNaxpKHg3r7tXHo356HVN3AKDC
+7i67AjGo0F5NqOkmiqEPTootg==
=9mol
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--