pgp/mime vs in-line pgp
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
avbidder at fortytwo.ch
Wed Apr 14 09:38:09 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 23.46, Graham wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 Apr 2004 9:22 pm, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
> > anyway, what if gpg supported quoted-printable input? how much of
> > the problem would that solve?
> GPG is not required to support quoted-printable (as in RFC2045), nor
> PGP/MIME (as in RFC3156): its a function of the MTA to support these.
You mean MUA. The only requirement on a MTA by PGP is that it should be
able to transport byte-for-byte copies of ascii messages.
Unfortunately, this is an area where many MTA have failed in the past
(and some still do), and especially when we leave ascii and enter 8-bit
land this is sometimes still a problem.
- -- vbi
The content of this message may or may not reflect the opinion of me, my
employer, my girlfriend, my cat or anybody else, regardless of the fact
whether such an employer, girlfriend, cat, or anybody else exists. I
(or my employer, girlfriend, cat or whoever) disclaim any legal
obligations resulting from the above message. You, as the reader of
this message, may or may not have the permission to redistribute this
message as a whole or in parts, verbatim or in modified form, or to
distribute any message at all.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users