pgp/mime vs in-line pgp

darren chamberlain dlc at
Wed Apr 14 16:51:51 CEST 2004

* Len Sassaman <rabbi at> [2004/04/13 19:41]:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Bjoern Buerger wrote:
> > > now to convince the pine team at UW to implement such a simple
> > > thing!
> >
> > Since _you_ want to use pine, it would be up to _you_ to do that. If
> > they don't plan to implement it themselves, best thing would be to
> > send them patches.
> Unfortunately, it's not that easy. Pine is under a "non-free" license,
> and the Pine authors have repeatedly rejected such patches. They have
> no interest in OpenPGP support, period.

Sounds like a pretty good reason for a security- and privacy-conscious
user to switch to something else...


What a strange illusion it is to suppose that beauty is goodness.
    -- Leo Tolstoy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040414/e1224d5e/attachment.bin

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list