[GnuPG] Re: Question about multiple secret keys

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Thu Aug 12 16:20:37 CEST 2004


On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:36:10 -0400, James P Howard, said:

> I am not.  Further, setting --no-verbose has not improved the
> situation:

See:
                if (opt.verbose)
                  log_info ( _("no secret subkey "
                               "for public subkey %08lX - ignoring\n"),  
                           (ulong)keyid_from_pk (pk,NULL) );

2003-04-29  Werner Koch  <wk at gnupg.org>

	* sig-check.c (check_key_signature2): Made "no subkey for subkey
	binding packet" a verbose item instead of a !quiet one.  There are
	too many garbled keys out in the wild.
	* getkey.c (premerge_public_with_secret): Made "no secret subkey
	for" warning a verbose item and translatable.

Thus I conclude your version is older than 1.2.2 - please update to
the latest one.

  Werner




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list