[Announce] GnuPG stable 1.4 released

David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Fri Dec 17 15:35:21 CET 2004

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 09:24:00AM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 09:11:08AM +0100, Kai Raven wrote:
> > RPM building works and GnuPG runs fine under Fedora Core 3.  But it
> > was necessary to put the option exec-path for the keyserver helpers
> > into gpg.conf. It wasn't necessary with a manual compilation of
> > 1.3.92.
> Where do the keyserver helpers end up with an RPM build?  If they
> aren't in your $PATH, then you do need exec-path.

Oops - meant to say "If they aren't in your libexecdir", which is
/usr/local/libexec/gnupg unless you override it at configure time.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20041217/0ac3cedc/attachment.bin

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list