MUA questions
Atom 'Smasher'
atom-gpg at suspicious.org
Wed Feb 4 20:14:20 CET 2004
does anyone know of a comparative list of mail clients showing how they
handle:
* generating inline signatures
* verifying inline signatures
* generating attached signatures
* verifying attached signatures
is it generally considered better etiquette to use an inline or attached
signature? which one is considered to be supported most widely [in mail
clients]?
similarly, do any mail clients have a problem with an encrypted message
body? sometimes i get an empty body with an encrypted attachment... i find
it rather annoying and inconvenient.
...atom
_______________________________________________
PGP key - http://smasher.suspicious.org/pgp.txt
3EBE 2810 30AE 601D 54B2 4A90 9C28 0BBF 3D7D 41E3
-------------------------------------------------
"It is the silent acquiescence of millions that supports the
system. When you don't oppose a system, your silence becomes
approval, for it does nothing to interrupt the system... Many
people say it is insane to resist the system, but actually,
it is insane not to."
-- Mumia Abu-Jamal
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list