Bug: Unusable key

Per Tunedal Casual pt at radvis.nu
Fri Feb 6 19:39:55 CET 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
reply below:
At 22:11 2004-02-05, you wrote:
 >David Shaw wrote:
 >
 >>Even if the error list was only printed if there were no usable
 >>(sub)keys at all, over time the list would just get longer and longer.
 >
 >Are there really users who add periodically a new encryption subkey to their
 >keyring and so build up a large list of revoked keys?

Yes, it's recommended in the PGP-manual to regularely change encryptions
keys but keep the signing key. Motivation: you don't loose your signatures
as if you create a completely new key.

That's what I intended to do with the key I had trouble with ...

 >
 >Anyway, an error message that just prints something like "all encryption
 >keys in this key are revoked or expired" would suffice in this case.
 >

I agree.


 >--
 >ir. J.C.A. Wevers         //  Physics and science fiction site:
 >johanw at vulcan.xs4all.nl   //  http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
 >PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html
 >
 >_______________________________________________
 >Gnupg-users mailing list
 >Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
 >http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.94

iD8DBQFAI9+N2Jp9Z++ji2YRAsH/AKCNj97Fgv2xsBkjOr0+whj5QX/RvgCfXkQM
/kjZrF3Iq50O+F+PXg/D6gU=
=6fRZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list