evolution & textmode

Brian V Bonini b-bonini at cox.net
Tue Jan 20 09:01:25 CET 2004


On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 03:02, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2004 02:16, Brian V Bonini wrote:
> 
> > Because quite a few mailing lists will not allow it because it's a
> > binary attachment. Half-ass anti-virus tactics I suppose. Obviously can
> > work around it but was just curious if it was possible with Evo.
> 
> This has nothing to do with the type of the signature, it's an issue with the 
> mailing list manager: they block all  multipart/... emails. Write to 
> <listname>-owner@<whatever> and tell them that they should allow multipart/
> signed emails. At least with mailman, this should not be a problem at all.

I realize that, but the whole scenario still brought about the question,
so I asked.


-- 
Brian        GnuPG -> KeyID: 0x04A4F0DC | URL: www.gfx-design.com/keys
                                          Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
======================================================================
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 04A4F0DC
GnuPG: http://gnupg.org
http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x2C35011004A4F0DC
Linux Registered User #339825 at http://counter.li.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040120/6dcceb15/attachment.bin


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list