debianuser@brown.edu

[Mark Kirchner]

Hi,

On Thursday, January 22, 2004, 3:06:33 PM, Scott wrote:
> The rules for filtering spam were probably written by someone who thinks
> Debian is an 'all natural' V-!- at -G-R-@ substitute.   

Hmm, I don't think so. :-)

The X-Spam-Status Line says:
| X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_MULTIPLE_RBL,
|         RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.62

The successful tests (RCVD_IN_MULTIPLE_RBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL,
RCVD_IN_SORBS) seem to indicate that the sending host (or some other
host host in the "Received:"-lines of the mail) has entries in several
(anti-spam-)blacklists.
Well, at least, I hope I'm not totally off with this explanation...

Regards,
Mark Kirchner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-David Beyer [mailto:jdbeyer at exit109.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:19 AM
> To: GnuPG Users' List
> Subject: debianuser at brown.edu
>
>
> My ISP runs SpamAssassin and it is catching a lot of emails allegedly 
> from debianuser at brown.edu with subject Encrypting messages truncates 
> trailing whitespace. These get a spam rating of 6.2 (fairly high, but by 
> no means a record).
>
> Any idea what is the matter with these e-mails? I looked at one and it 
> seems on the up-and-up. Here is part of the headers:
>
> [snip]

-- 
_____________________________________________________________
Key (0x19DC86D3): http://www.mark-kirchner.de/keys/key-mk.asc