Looking for Elgamal sign+encrypt key information
rabbi at quickie.net
Tue Mar 16 03:54:49 CET 2004
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
> looks like the latest draft doesn't really encourage RSA....
> Implementations MUST implement DSA for signatures, and ElGamal for
> encryption. Implementations SHOULD implement RSA keys.
> Implementations MAY implement any other algorithm.
> so, if one were to make an RSA-only key, that key would not be strictly
> openPGP compliant? one would have to add an ElGamal subkey, for full
> in that case, what would be a good way (or ways) to force the sender to
> use the RSA encryption key, and only use the ElGamal encryption key if RSA
> isn't supported on their end?
The RFC applies to implementations, not use models.
More information about the Gnupg-users