Group use of keys

Atom 'Smasher' atom at suspicious.org
Mon Nov 22 20:50:09 CET 2004


On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Christopher C. Stacy wrote:

> That's probably because he was on a completely trusted network, where 
> the network, the shielded building it's in, every device, and every 
> person, is cleared to handle classified material. That doesn't mean that 
> it wouldn't be a good idea to use encryption anyway, but it's unlikely 
> that the situation is as un-secured as you might imagine.  Usually in 
> order to break into these networks network, first you have to get past 
> several physical barriers, each of which involces guards armed with 
> machine guns.  Prime numbers will be the least of your concerns.
===============

no doubt. that's a side effect of working for an organization so big that 
security is "someone else's job" and the sysadmin can't be bothered with 
it. it becomes a very serious issue when someone then uses that experience 
to get a job where they can be dangerous... IT security just doesn't have 
any relevance to this guy, despite a (military) resume that hints 
otherwise.


-- 
         ...atom

  _________________________________________
  PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
  762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
  -------------------------------------------------

 	"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil
 	 is for good men to do nothing."
 		-- Edmund Burke





More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list