Group use of keys
Atom 'Smasher'
atom at suspicious.org
Mon Nov 22 20:50:09 CET 2004
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Christopher C. Stacy wrote:
> That's probably because he was on a completely trusted network, where
> the network, the shielded building it's in, every device, and every
> person, is cleared to handle classified material. That doesn't mean that
> it wouldn't be a good idea to use encryption anyway, but it's unlikely
> that the situation is as un-secured as you might imagine. Usually in
> order to break into these networks network, first you have to get past
> several physical barriers, each of which involces guards armed with
> machine guns. Prime numbers will be the least of your concerns.
===============
no doubt. that's a side effect of working for an organization so big that
security is "someone else's job" and the sysadmin can't be bothered with
it. it becomes a very serious issue when someone then uses that experience
to get a job where they can be dangerous... IT security just doesn't have
any relevance to this guy, despite a (military) resume that hints
otherwise.
--
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil
is for good men to do nothing."
-- Edmund Burke
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list