Detecting PGP 2.6.x keys
jharris at widomaker.com
Fri Sep 17 20:26:10 CEST 2004
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:24:40AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> In any event, let's play with the numbers a bit. I misremembered the
> statistics when I wrote that email. It's actually *worse* for V3
> keys: slightly over 95% for V4 keys and slightly under 5% for V3.
> Stats as of May 2002 (as per
> V2 keys 18159
> V3 keys 143068
> V4 keys 3055126
> These are stats from 2002, but I'd be pretty shocked to see that V3
> keys grew at a faster rate than V4 between then and now.
I posted newer numbers to this list with these subjects:
key count, 2004-03-01
key count, 2004-03-31
key count, 2004-07-06 (+ duplicates by short keyid)
The 2004-07-06 numbers were 172293 v2/v3 pubkeys and 1856928 v4 pubkeys
(with 1870716 subkeys) or 11066 new v2/v3 pubkeys v. 672518 new v4 keys
(pubkeys and subkeys) from 2002-05-2x to 2004-07-06.
Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com _|_ web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040917/4e027d6f/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-users