Detecting PGP 2.6.x keys

Jason Harris jharris at widomaker.com
Fri Sep 17 20:26:10 CEST 2004


On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:24:40AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:

> In any event, let's play with the numbers a bit.  I misremembered the
> statistics when I wrote that email.  It's actually *worse* for V3
> keys: slightly over 95% for V4 keys and slightly under 5% for V3.
> 
> Stats as of May 2002 (as per
>    http://lists.alt.org/pipermail/pgp-keyserver-folk/2002-May/001853.html):
> 
>       V2 keys 18159
>       V3 keys 143068
>       V4 keys 3055126
> 
> These are stats from 2002, but I'd be pretty shocked to see that V3
> keys grew at a faster rate than V4 between then and now.

I posted newer numbers to this list with these subjects:

  key count, 2004-03-01
  key count, 2004-03-31
  key count, 2004-07-06 (+ duplicates by short keyid)

The 2004-07-06 numbers were 172293 v2/v3 pubkeys and 1856928 v4 pubkeys
(with 1870716 subkeys) or 11066 new v2/v3 pubkeys v. 672518 new v4 keys
(pubkeys and subkeys) from 2002-05-2x to 2004-07-06.

-- 
Jason Harris           |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
          Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040917/4e027d6f/attachment.bin


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list