Weaknesses in SHA-1

[markus reichelt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Per Tunedal Casual <pt at radvis.nu> wrote:
> Someone with some encryption knowledge would better send Bruce
> Schneier a comment to his article.

why? he states:

"To a user of cryptographic systems -- as I assume most readers are --
this news is important, but not particularly worrisome.  MD5 and SHA
aren't suddenly insecure.  No one is going to be breaking digital
signatures or reading encrypted messages anytime soon with these
techniques.  The electronic world is no less secure after these
announcements than it was before."



- -- 
Bastard Administrator in $hell

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBU+cMLMyTO8Kj/uQRAgcXAJ9NoW672/65nPNzL0LDJvFzJ06jSwCfQMlk
M7XSsCfN2+KiIYkGd187AD8=
=g1q5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----