Protecting signing key]
eocsor at gmail.com
Wed Aug 3 08:43:41 CEST 2005
loop-aes is not in the vanilla kernel sources.
dm-crypt and cryptoloop are.
cryptoloop is depreciated, use dm-crypt instead.
dm-crypt'd main advantage is that it's already in the kernel, whereas
loop-aes is a add-on. Look at the different modes of encryption
supported and make a decision from there.
I use dm-crypt for what its worth, though I wouldn't have any problems
with using loop-aes instead.
On 8/3/05, Kara <karadenizi at earthlink.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Subject: Re: Protecting signing key
> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 23:23:59 +0000
> From: cdr <cedar at 3web.net>
> To: gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> > One solution (free, with full source) can be found here:
> > http://www.truecrypt.org/
> What would be an equally good equivalent
> for those of us using a Linux distro?
> - --
> "As long as algebra is taught in school, there
> will be prayer in school." - Cokie Roberts
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2rc2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using Fedora and Enigmail
> Comment: OpenPGP keyID and URL in Message Headers
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
More information about the Gnupg-users