Arguments for inline PGP
Alphax
alphasigmax at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 11:04:18 CEST 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michael Daigle wrote:
<snip>
> It's unfortunate, but it's prevalent - and that's why inlined PGP is a
> good thing. We can still retain message authentication despite the
> goof-ball between us and the recipient.
Quite often, the goof-ball *is* the recipient. At that point,
*Draw circle on desk*
*Bang head here*
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC+cMS/RxM5Ph0xhMRAynkAJsH+CY87CSUMITi+rHEF7Q7TfFCegCgqflD
Q8SsuFb8wzXh/MePjO5Ns1w=
=PL6+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list